<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Common Core &#187; event</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.commoncore.org/tag/event/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.commoncore.org</link>
	<description>Promoting a full core curriculum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:55:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Common Core Event: What is the Proper Role of Skills in the Curriculum</title>
		<link>http://blog.commoncore.org/2009/02/26/common-core-event-what-is-the-proper-role-of-skills-in-the-curriculum/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.commoncore.org/2009/02/26/common-core-event-what-is-the-proper-role-of-skills-in-the-curriculum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lbornfreund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[21st Century Skills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curriculum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[21st_century_skills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.commoncore.org/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On February 24, Common Core held a panel discussion to critique the idea of 21st century skills. Discussants included Diane Ravitch, E.D. Hirsch Jr., Daniel Willingham, and Ken Kay. Remarks from panelists can found be here. We knew that this topic is a contentious one that would pique lots of interest. It did: with more than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">On February 24, Common Core held a panel discussion to critique the idea of 21<sup>st</sup> century skills. Discussants included Diane Ravitch, E.D. Hirsch Jr., Daniel Willingham, and Ken Kay. Remarks from panelists can found be <a href="http://www.commoncore.org/p21.php"><span style="color: blue;">here</span></a>.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 15.6pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; color: black;">We knew that this topic is a contentious one that would pique lots of interest. It did: with more than 100 people in attendance, there was not an empty spot in the room (many attendees found semi-comfortable spots on the floor).</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 15.6pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; color: black;">Ravitch, Hirsch, and Willingham all challenged Kay’s belief that learning skills is more important than understanding the content that allows skills to be used.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 15.6pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; color: black;">Hirsch argued that “the error at the heart of P21 [the Partnership for 21<sup>st</sup> Century Skills] is the idea that skills are all-purpose muscles that, once developed, can be applied to new and unforeseen domains of experience.” More quotes from panelists on <a href="http://www.edexcellence.net/flypaper/"><span style="color: blue;">Flypaper</span></a>.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 15.6pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; color: black;">Which is the point that many critics of the 21<sup>st</sup> century skills movement have made: knowledge is the foundation for learning.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 15.6pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; color: black;">Kay asserted that he believes P21 is driving the content <strong>and</strong> skills movement. If that were actually the case then that’s what he would’ve called it: the Partnership for 21<sup>st</sup> Century Skills and Content. Ravitch challenged him to rebrand.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 15.6pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; color: black;">But it’s important to remember that P21 is focused more on business interests than on student learning interests. Yes, all kids need to learn how to be good critical thinkers, communicators, and collaborators. They need to be tech savvy, globally aware, and financially intelligent, too. But do these skills need to be assessed by schools? Should they become a part of state standards? Ken Kay’s make the case for their inclusion.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 15.6pt; background-image: initial; background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: white;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; color: black;">Robert Pondiscio over at the Core Knowledge Blog says:</span></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 40px; padding: 0px; border: initial none initial;">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">A broad, solid knowledge-based curriculum is square one for developing “21st Century Skills.” Inspired, creative teaching–not wish fulfillment codified by squishy, ill-defined standards–gets us the rest of the way. That might not fit on a bumper sticker, but it might work.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">Common Core agrees. More event commentary to come. Also keep an eye out for the event video; it will be posted soon. </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.commoncore.org/2009/02/26/common-core-event-what-is-the-proper-role-of-skills-in-the-curriculum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Event: What is the Proper Role of Skills in the Curriculum? A Critique of the Idea of 21st Century Skills.</title>
		<link>http://blog.commoncore.org/2009/02/17/event-what-is-the-proper-role-of-skills-in-the-curriculum-a-critique-of-the-idea-of-21st-century-skills/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.commoncore.org/2009/02/17/event-what-is-the-proper-role-of-skills-in-the-curriculum-a-critique-of-the-idea-of-21st-century-skills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lbornfreund</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[21st Century Skills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curriculum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[21st_century_skills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.commoncore.org/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[February 24, 2009 1:30p.m. &#8211; 3:00p.m. 1016 16th St. NW, 7th Floor Washington, D.C. 20036 The teaching of skills is taking an increasingly prominent role in our classrooms. Numerous states are integrating skills such as critical thinking, global awareness, and media and business literacy into their standards and tests. But is the idea of orienting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>February 24, 2009</p>
<p>1:30p.m. &#8211; 3:00p.m.</p>
<p>1016 16th St. NW, 7th Floor</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Washington, D.C. 20036</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-style: italic;">The teaching of skills is taking an increasingly prominent role in our classrooms. Numerous states are integrating skills such as critical thinking, global awareness, and media and business literacy into their standards and tests. But is the idea of orienting education around skills either sound or new?</span></p>
<p><em>Come hear the opinions of a historian, an educator, a cognitive scientist, and an advocate for 21st century skills.</em></p>
<p>Panelists:</p>
<p>DIANE RAVITCH</p>
<p>Research Professor of</p>
<p>Education, New York University</p>
<p>E. D. HIRSCH, JR.</p>
<p>Founder and Chairman, Core</p>
<p>Knowledge Foundation</p>
<p>DANIEL WILLINGHAM</p>
<p>Professor of Psychology,</p>
<p>University of Virginia</p>
<p>KEN KAY</p>
<p>President, Partnership for</p>
<p>21st Century Skills</p>
<p>Moderator:</p>
<p>ANTONIA CORTESE</p>
<p>Secretary-Treasurer, American</p>
<p>Federation of Teachers</p>
<p>RSVP to: info@commoncore.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.commoncore.org/2009/02/17/event-what-is-the-proper-role-of-skills-in-the-curriculum-a-critique-of-the-idea-of-21st-century-skills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

