Archive for the ‘Arts’ Category

LAUSD Rescues the Arts

Friday, October 12th, 2012

The board of the Los Angeles Unified School District is giving arts education the emphasis it deserves.  In a bold and necessary move, L.A.’s school board members unanimously voted in favor of restoring the arts to their rightful place as a critical “core” subject.  According to Steven McCarthy, senior arts coordinator at Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), elevating the arts to a “core” subject will enable the arts to “be seen as important as social studies, science, math, and language arts.”  We applaud board member Nury Martinez, the author of the arts resolution, and her colleagues for preventing the arts from falling victim to budget cuts and working with Superintendent John Deasy to refocus the district on this often neglected subject.

This move to revitalize arts education is deeply consistent with the expectations of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and demonstrates LAUSD’s profound commitment to implementing the new standards to a high degree of faithfulness.  In fact, the importance of arts education has become one of the central themes surrounding the CCSS.  In a recent blog salon hosted by Americans for the Arts, fifteen arts and education leaders, including Common Core’s Lynne Munson, contributed blogs surrounding the intersection of the arts and the CCSS. In a compelling finale piece, David Coleman, an architect of the CCSS in ELA, commented, “I am so glad that the arts community has gotten the message that the arts have a central and essential role in achieving the finest aspects of the common core.”  Common Core is thrilled to see L.A.’s K-12 community converting this message into action. 

Elevating the arts is critical to the discussion of CCSS implementation particularly in light of California Governor Jerry Brown’s agenda to strip education of a commitment core subjects.  In fact, this resolution comes as a direct rejection of Governor’s Brown’s persistent agenda—to which Common Core is actively protested—to reduce or even eliminate high graduation requirements in critical core subjects including the arts, foreign languages, and sciences.  In fact, Brown signed a devastating bill in October 2011 that eliminated the requirement for all students to take either a foreign language or arts course to graduate.

We certainly hope that districts throughout California and the country will follow LAUSD’s lead in ramping up arts education and will look to this resolution as a shining model for how the core subject should be emphasized in K-12 education.  Implementing the CCSS presents a wonderful opportunity to use the arts to deepen the teaching of other core subjects, in addition to teaching the arts for their own sake.  As you know, Common Core has extensively demonstrated, in the 179 arts activities that are imbedded in our CCSS-based Curriculum Maps in ELA, the central role the arts can play in the ELA curriculum.  We are happy to find an arts ally in LAUSD.

Lynne Munson and Hillary Marder

 

How Vincent van Gogh Can Help You Teach to the CCSS

Monday, September 17th, 2012

Henri Matisse in Kindergarten? Leonardo da Vinci in fifth grade? These names don’t often come to mind while thinking about instruction in English Language Arts. But they should.

In an age when literacy dominates public discourse on education, we must begin to think more broadly about what students read. Sure—the new Common Core State Standards emphasize close reading of high-quality, rigorous informational and literary texts, but they also support the “reading” and scrutiny of other forms of high-quality text. Works of art can, indeed should, be “read” in a very similar way to a poem by Shakespeare or a speech by Winston Churchill.

The CCSS present an exciting opportunity for elementary school teachers (who teach all subjects), grades 6-12 ELA teachers, and arts teachers to utilize the arts to teach the literacy skills outlined by the new standards. This should be done in addition to (not instead of) teaching the arts for their own sake. David Coleman, a lead writer of the CCSS in ELA has argued:

There is no such thing as doing the nuts and bolts of reading in Kindergarten through 5th grade without coherently developing knowledge in science, and history, and the arts…it is the deep foundation in rich knowledge and vocabulary depth that allows you to access more complex text.

Because it is not always obvious how to use a painting, film, play, or dance to meet the speaking, listening, and writing standards, Common Core has illustrated this in our Common Core Curriculum Maps in ELA.  Below are examples of how a teacher might design two arts-centered ELA activities using works by Louis Comfort Tiffany, Vincent van Gogh, Georges Seurat, and an unknown Chinese artist.  These activities are written for second graders:

 

Art, Speaking and Listening

Artists often convey a sense of season in their depictions of flowers or trees. Ask students to study the Tiffany image, van Gogh’s Mulberry Tree, and the work titled Snow-Laden Plum Branches. Note that these works were created on three different continents at around the same time period. Ask students to discuss similarities and differences in these artists’ techniques for depicting the seasons. (SL.2.2)

 

Vincent van Gogh, Mulberry Tree

Vincent van Gogh, Mulberry Tree

 

Art, Informative Writing

Select a work to study—for instance, you might choose the Georges Seurat for a clear depiction of a season. Ask the students to name the season that the artist has painted. Then have students write a two-or-three-sentence explanation identifying elements in the work that led them to their observation. (W.2.2)

 

Georges Seurat, Une Baignade, Asnieres

Georges Seurat, Une Baignade, Asnieres

 

The first activity engages students in close “reading” of three art pieces. Their settings and compositions convey a distinct message about a season. By engaging students in a discussion about their similarities and differences, students are practicing the skill outlined in the second speaking and listening standard for second grade in the CCSS (SL.2.2): “Recount or describe key ideas or details for a text read aloud or information presented orally or through other media.”[1]

In a similar fashion, the second activity enables students to practice the skill described in standard W.2.2: “Write informative/explanatory texts in which they introduce a topic, use facts and definitions to develop points, and provide a concluding statement or section,”[2] by considering a painting by Seurat. Just imagine how wonderful it would be to hear a second grader liken a summer outing in the park to Seurat’s Une Baignade, Asnieres.  While both activities address specific standards, they also build two other critically vital elements: students’ vocabulary and knowledge of important works of art. These assets contribute directly to students’ growth towards becoming skilled readers, writers, speakers, and thinkers.

These second grade activities are just two examples of the 179 arts activities included in Common Core’s ELA Maps that connect directly to the CCSS’ ELA standards. In fact, each of the 76 units that comprise our K-12 curriculum maps contain guidance for utilizing works of art, music, or film to teach to the new standards.

As students progress through the middle and high school grades, these arts activities demand increasingly complex analysis, thereby keeping pace with the standards while continuing to expand students’ knowledge of art history, and enriching their vocabulary. In an 8th grade unit titled “Urban Settings in America: It Happened in the City,” an arts activity engages students in the study of various depictions of New York City:

 

Art, Speaking and Listening

Edward Hopper’s Nighthawks and Piet Mondrian’s Broadway Boogie Woogie, which both depict New York City, were painted in the same year. Notice the dramatic difference in these artists’ styles. The difference goes beyond realism versus abstraction. Discuss the painters’ color palettes, the distance at which they placed the viewer, and the type of space in the work. Dwell on the extent to which each artist was focused on the people versus the place. Were they depicting the same time of day? (SL.8.1, SL.8.2, SL.8.4, SL.8.5)

 

Edward Hopper, Nighthawks

Edward Hopper, Nighthawks

 

Piet Mondrian, Broadway Boogie Woogie

Piet Mondrian, Broadway Boogie Woogie

 

The activity addresses four of the six speaking and learning standards in eighth grade, by having students compare the works’ composition, style, and subject. One of the standards addressed, SL.8.2, enables students to “analyze the purpose of information presented in diverse media and formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively, orally) and evaluate the motives (e.g. social, commercial, political) behind its presentation.”[3]

Common Core’s ELA Maps demonstrate that the CCSS are an ideal vehicle for providing students with ample opportunities to “read” art. Gearing up and tuning students’ skills of visual observation will help to develop them into insightful and analytical readers, dexterous writers, and adept speakers, while also turning them into avid art lovers.

Lynne Munson

 


[1] Common Core State Standards Initiative, Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects: K-5, http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf, 23.

[2] Common Core State Standards Initiative, Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects: K-5http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf, 19.

[3] Common Core State Standards Initiative, Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects: 6-12, http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf, 49.

California’s Governor Cuts Arts, Foreign Language—Now Science. What’s Next?

Monday, March 5th, 2012

California Governor Jerry Brown is proposing to cut the state’s already minimal high school graduation requirement for science in half.  Currently California students must complete two courses – one in the biological sciences and another in the physical sciences – to graduate.  Brown has released a budget that replaces this with just one class.  That means California high-schoolers could graduate having taken only an earth science class and have no knowledge of the basics of biology, chemistry, or physics and zero exposure to laboratory practice.  

Brown’s pitiful proposal is not worthy of the Silicon Valley state, or any state for that matter.  Most states require at least 2 years of science as a minimum graduation requirement.   However, many states, such as Massachusetts, Kentucky, and Virginia (whose 4th and 8th graders performed above the national average on the 2009 NAEP science exam) require at least 3 years of science for graduation.  In contrast, California’s fourth graders tied Mississippi’s for the lowest scores on the 2009 NAEP exam.  Based on this evidence, the logical response would be to increase California’s science requirement, not reduce it.

In fact, Common Core conducted an analysis of the NAEP science data in 2009 and found that the number of courses students took appeared to have a significant impact on their performance.  Here’s the key data from that analysis:

Students who took both biology and chemistry scored 15 points higher than those who just took biology or any other single science course, and those who took physics in addition to biology and chemistry scored 33 points higher than single science course-takers.  A quick analysis shows that this amounts, approximately, to an 11% improvement for each additional science course taken.  So students who took three science courses scored 22% higher than those who took just one.

Governor Brown is establishing a track record for lowering expectations for California public school students. Just last year the Governor put the arts and foreign languages on the chopping block.  In October, Brown signed a bill into law that eliminates the requirement for all students to take either a foreign language or arts course to graduate.  Students can now take career-technical education courses instead.  At the behest of Common Core and California-based arts and foreign language advocates, former Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed a bill containing this same proposal in 2010.

Brown’s curriculum proposal would guarantee that thousands of students graduate high school unqualified for admission to California’s public universities.  CA’s state schools mandate that students take at least two years of a foreign language, and one year of art to qualify for admittance.   The California State University system requires applicants to have two years of science, while the University of California system recommends three science courses and mandates laboratory experience.  Thus, lowering the bar to only one year of science, while also eliminating any coursework in foreign language or the arts, puts California high school students at a terrible disadvantage.  If this trajectory continues, we hate to think what subject could be next on Brown’s hit list.   

Senate President Darrell Steinberg indicates he is in no hurry to validate the Governor’s budget plan: “We’re not going to rush to make any of these decisions, especially on the cuts side.”  This delay is an opportunity for concerned parents, teachers, and students to voice their opposition.  In fact, some districts, including Vacaville Unified School District and Travis Unifies School District, have taken an immediate stand and announced that they have no plans to reduce the 2-year science requirement.  We hope Governor Brown heeds these warnings and retracts his proposal.

Lynne Munson, Emily Dodd, and Hillary Marder

 

Reversal of Fortune in California

Thursday, October 20th, 2011

A new law in California eliminates California’s arts and foreign language high school graduation requirement by allowing students to take a career-technical education (CTE) course instead.

Sound familiar? AB 1330 is nearly identical to a bill vetoed by then-Governor Schwarzenegger last fall at the urging of Common Core, among others.  By signing AB 1330 into law, Governor Brown damages the teaching of the arts and foreign language in his state and guarantees thousands of students will graduate high school unqualified for admission to California’s public universities.

The new law continues a trend in California (and across the nation): With budgets tight, more than three-quarters of California’s school districts have reduced their art and music offerings over the past two years. One quarter of those districts have dropped the classes entirely.

The University of California and California State University systems require high school students to graduate with an education across the liberal arts, including courses in the arts and foreign language. In fact, arts and foreign-language courses are twice as likely as CTE classes to be certified as college-prep courses.  To be considered for admission to California’s public universities, students must complete fifteen year-long UC-approved school courses with a grade C or better:

History and Social Science, 2 years

English, 4 years

Math, 3 years

Lab science, 2 years (3 recommended)

Foreign Language, 2 years (3 recommended)

Arts, 1 year of dance, drama, music or visual art

Elective, 1 year

The law is packaged as dropout prevention. But easing graduation requirements doesn’t lower dropout rates. In fact, rigorous graduation requirements have been found to reduce the dropout rate for high poverty students. The law’s actual effect will be reduced post-high school options for all of California’s more than 6 million public school students. The law also sends the clear message that the arts and foreign language are not as important to the state as the other subjects.

As states, districts, and schools continue to focus more narrowly on reading and math at the expense of subjects like art and foreign language, we’re disappointed to see California follow this trend.

Stephanie Porowski

The “Continuous Narrowing” of ESEA

Monday, October 17th, 2011

In September 2009, when reauthorization of ESEA seemed imminent, Secretary Duncan said, “Let us build a law that discourages a narrowing of curriculum and promotes a well-rounded education that draws children into sciences and history, languages and the arts in order to build a society distinguished by both intellectual and economic prowess.”

Now, more than two years later, Sen. Harkin has released a draft ESEA reauthorization proposal. And, in spite of the Department’s significant influence, the draft bill’s support of the “well-rounded education” Duncan touted is, well, almost undetectable.

The document is 860 pages long. Student achievement in “Core Academic Subjects” is referenced a dozen times, but specifics never arise. This tome contains no mentions of chemistry, physics, or biology, for example. Music gets four mentions; art only one. And history and civics just two. How are we going to improve education if no one is willing to talk about the substance of what is being taught?

Meanwhile, the shape, method, and approach to accountability measures continue to be tweaked, tuned, and obsessed over. The big news the draft contains is a reinvention of the current accountability system, scrapping AYP’s strict performance targets in favor of a measure of “continuous improvement” for all students and for particular subgroups.

But “continuous improvement” will do nothing to address ESEA’s intense focus on math and reading at the expense of the rest of the liberal arts. Although the bill would shift testing requirements to include measures for student growth, required tests would continue to measure student achievement in only math, reading and science. And the science test would remain inconsequential to “continuous improvement.” Why not widen the lens of the “continuous improvement” measure to include other subjects? It is an idea that would present many challenges and face many obstacles, but it is at least worth discussing.

Writing about the unintended consequences of NCLB, Diane Ravitch and Checker Finn predicted, “Rich kids will study philosophy and art, music and history, while their poor peers will fill in bubbles on test sheets. The lucky few will spawn the next generation of tycoons, political leaders, inventors, authors, artists and entrepreneurs. The less lucky masses will see narrower opportunities.”

We know that is happening already. And if anything resembling Harkin’s draft becomes law, the problem will only get worse.

Lynne Munson

What’s Your Mission?

Friday, July 1st, 2011

In today’s New York Times, David Brooks opines on the rift between education historian Diane Ravitch and many in the education reform movement she once championed. While Brooks finds faults with much of Ravitch’s message, the truth he finds in it is solid gold:

“Most important, she is right that teaching is a humane art built upon loving relationships between teachers and students. If you orient the system exclusively around a series of multiple choice accountability assessments, you distort it.

“If you make tests all-important, you give schools an incentive to drop the subjects that don’t show up on the exams but that help students become fully rounded individuals — like history, poetry, art and sports. You may end up with schools that emphasize test-taking, not genuine learning. You may create incentives for schools to game the system by easing out kids who might bring the average scores down, for example.”

School leaders: Rather than rallying around tests, unite your schools around a clear and vibrant mission. And, we would add, make it about exposing your students—whatever their demographic backgrounds—to the best in the arts, history, foreign languages, sciences, mathematics, and literature.

Stephanie Porowski

What’s a Liberal Arts Education Really Worth?

Thursday, May 26th, 2011

In Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities, philosopher Martha Nussbaum writes:

“With the rush to profitability in the global market, values precious for the future of democracy, especially in an era of religious and economic anxiety, are in danger of getting lost. … World history and economic understanding must be humanistic and critical if they are to be at all useful in forming intelligent global citizens, and they must be taught alongside the study of religion and of philosophical theories of justice. Only then will they supply a useful foundation for the public debates that we must have if we are to cooperate in solving major human problems.”

Yes, Kevin McCann, education is about “finding out what you want to do in the world.” It’s also about learning to pursue those desires with thoughtfulness and integrity. As Nussbaum also writes, “Knowledge is not a guarantee of good … behavior, but ignorance is a virtual guarantee of bad behavior. In a world full of simple stereotypes, we will only preserve democratic values of debate and mutual respect if we try hard to understand the past and the present.”

Our students need jobs. But do the requirements of a good job—at any level—necessarily exclude deep study of history, foreign language and art?

What’s your take on the purpose of education?

Arts Ed: Exercise for the Creative Mind

Monday, May 16th, 2011

Today, we’re reading a piece by Michael Kaiser, the President of the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. He highlights the President’s Committee on the Arts & Humanities’ new report and its call for “reinvesting in arts education.” It is the job of those in the arts, he writes, to create smarter, stronger more efficient arts programming for children—programs that  ”exercis[e]” creativity:

“Will someone with no arts experiences as a child automatically become a subscriber or donor to the arts when they hit middle age? Will they volunteer at a local dance school? Will they be willing to join the board of a theater company? I doubt it. …

Who better to play a role in exercising the creative minds of our children than we in the arts? How are students going to build confidence in their abilities to create if they are not given access to education that goes beyond reading, writing and arithmetic?

Those who argue that investing in arts education is frivolous are simply wrong. …

[A]rts organizations are going to have to do more and better arts education in the coming years; we are going to have to work together to create smarter, stronger more efficient arts programming for children.

The health of our field and of our nation is at stake.”

 

Art Works?

Wednesday, March 9th, 2011

The latest data from the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) show arts programs in the midst of drastic budget cuts.  Only 50 percent of 18-year-olds surveyed report receiving any arts education in school. And the numbers are worse for minorities. Only 26 percent of African-Americans surveyed report having arts instruction in school.  And only 28 percent of Hispanics (down from 47 percent in 1982).

Recent scores on the NAEP Arts assessment show similar gaps. In 2008, black and Hispanic students scored significantly lower than White and Asian students. Cuts in school programming forced the NAEP test to focus primarily on the visual arts and music, instead of all four arts areas (dance, music, visual art, and theatre) – so much for a well-rounded arts education.

Arne Duncan encourages schools to “cut smart:” to reduce shortsighted cuts, especially in the instruction of the arts. Yet, the arts verge on nonexistent in President Obama’s new budget plan for the Department of Education. Instead, STEM education is its top priority. Science, technology, engineering and math training is the focus.  In practice, the emphasis of STEM education is often more on technology with little science, engineering, or math to go with it. Don’t students need to know about more than technology to succeed, even in the 21st century?

Research shows that children are more likely to be successful with a strong background in the arts. The best and brightest recognize the importance of music, dance, and visual arts in K-12 programming. So why aren’t we making the arts available to all of our students?

Meagan Estep

Lowering the Bar in Wyoming

Wednesday, January 19th, 2011

With an eye to keeping its best and brightest students in the state, Wyoming offers top high school students Hathaway Merit Scholarships. To be eligible for any of four levels of the scholarship, students must take a foreign language, among other requirements.

But the Wyoming Senate is poised to lower requirements for the scholarship. On Monday, House Bill 13, which would modify Hathaway’s requirements so that high school students could take fine and performing arts or vocational classes in place of a foreign language, passed a vote in the House.

With so many of its students struggling in college, the state should think twice before lowering the rigor of the scholarship. Wyoming (like most other states) already posts abysmal college retention and graduation rates: Only 77 percent of students at four year—and 65 percent at two-year—colleges return their sophomore years. While only 57 percent go on to earn a degree. Nearly seventeen percent of the lowest and—and ten percent of the middle—tiers of Hathaway recipients lose their scholarships because of poor academic performance.

Yet HB 13 has broad, if misguided, support in both parties, as well as in the arts community. A supporter of the bill says, “It puts all these core areas on equal footing.”

Maybe so. But it relegates all of these subjects to optional status. To better prepare scholarship recipients for the academic rigors of college, and to establish art and foreign language as “core areas” of a liberal arts curriculum, Wyoming should require both subjects. And do away with skills-obsessed and content-lite vocational ed options.

Update: Yesterday the Senate approved the bill by voice vote. It comes up for a second reading today. Stay tuned.

Stephanie Porowski and Lynne Munson