Japan’s “PISA Shock”

Astonished at the slip in student performance in recent years, Japan is reconsidering its now ten-year-old experiment in “pressure-free” education. “There’s a sense of crisis,” said a professor of education in Tokyo, “there are serious concerns about whether our education system is working … .”

Yet, in contrast to the United States’ relatively abysmal performance on PISA (29th in science and 35th in math), Japan’s scores (6th in science and 10th in math) remain well above the OECD average, and its education system is consistently heralded (for good reason) as one worthy of emulation.

So why the “shock”? Japan’s drop (from first in math in 2000 to 10th in 2006) has coincided with a dramatic move away from the so-called “cram education” to a more “student-centered” approach, as educators slashed content requirements and focused instead on supporting students in their application of knowledge to real-life situations. At the expense of fundamentals, Japan added electives and spent more time exploring students’ questions, like “Why doesn’t a sleeping bird fall from its perch on a branch?”

Japan’s current situation is especially interesting in light of the new Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for math and English, which of course seek to raise US standards. But, with the CCSS, American students will learn how to determine the area of a trapezoid in sixth grade, a full year after Japanese students learn the same concept. So we’re still behind.

Japan’s bravely called its failed education experiment what it is ‒ a “huge failure.” Japan should be applauded for moving back to its roots in deep content. As US educators create curricula in response to the CCSS, we hope we will avoid Japan’s costly mistake.

Lynne Munson and Stephanie Porowski

One Response to “Japan’s “PISA Shock””

  1. Pete says:

    I didn’t know “Japan” had intentionality. Japan does not call anything a failure or a success. People or agencies within Japan do that. This blog makes it sound like Japanese people are incapable of having a debate. Obviously people are looking at those scores and not alarmed because they realize they are trading lower scores for increased curiosity and creativity – things that PISA tests are poor at measuring.

Leave a Reply