Archive for September, 2010

Reading, the Untweet

Thursday, September 30th, 2010

English teacher Carol Jago, who is also president of the National Council of Teachers of English, has published a provocative commentary in this month’s Council Chronicle. In “A Literary Education–Priceless” Jago argues that there continue to be a raft of reasons to read excellent literature, and insists that students still have time to read books, despite claims to the contrary. We recommend reading the whole article (just like we recommend that students read whole books), but here’s a brief excerpt to heighten your interest:

“Your students won’t read 19th-century novels, you say? Too long? Too boring? That 21st-century students raised on Twitter need a faster pace? I say English class may be the last place where they can unplug themselves from the solipsism of Facebook postings and enter a milieu different from their own in order to learn about human problems worthy of attention. “But my students won’t do the homework reading I assign,” teachers wail.  It isn’t as though students don’t have the time.  A 2010 study by the Kaiser Family Foundation reports that children aged eight to eighteen spend an average of seven and a half hours a day “consuming entertainment media.” And this does not include the hour and a half a day they spend texting friends. Our students have the time to read; they simply choose not to. Teachers and parents need to help young people make better decisions about their use of time. What will it matter if the U.S. wins the economic race to the top if we lose all feeling for others apart from those in our close and closed circle of friends in the process? Reading literature nurtures empathy. Your students won’t read 19th-century novels, you say? Too long?  Too boring? That 21st-century students raised on Twitter need a faster pace? I say English class may be the last place where they can unplug themselves from the solipsism of Facebook postings and enter a milieu different from their own in order to learn about human problems worthy of attention. “But my students won’t do the homework reading I assign,” teachers wail. It isn’t as though students don’t have the time. A 2010 study by the Kaiser Family Foundation reports that children aged eight to eighteen spend an average of seven and a half hours a day “consuming entertainment media.” And this does not include the hour and a half a day they spend texting friends. Our students have the time to read; they simply choose not to. Teachers and parents need to help young people make better decisions about their use of time. What will it matter if the U.S. wins the economic race to the top if we lose all feeling for others apart from those in our close and closed circle of friends in the process? Reading literature nurtures empathy.”

Please, read on.

Lynne Munson

Hard Truth for the Golden State

Wednesday, September 29th, 2010

California’s NAEP scores have been an embarrassment for years. With an average statewide reading score of 210 in 4th grade and 253 in 8th grade, California falls nearly ten points below the national average for both grades. If California wants to raise these scores, the last thing state leaders should be doing is adopting policies that narrow the curriculum. That’s what AB2446 would do. If Governor Schwarzenegger allows this ill-conceived bill to become law he’ll be narrowing the curriculum in California high schools by eliminating any requirement that students take the arts or foreign language.

Evidence abounds to prove that a comprehensive curriculum raises achievement and makes students more career and college-ready. A recent ACT study found students more likely to earn a B or higher grade in their first-year college courses in every subject—from English to calculus, American history to biology—when students have taken a rigorous core curriculum in high school. Students who have taken a challenging core also are less likely to drop out of college or need remediation.

Fourteen of the states with high school graduation requirements that were deemed “college and career ready” by Achieve require their students take arts or foreign language.  Notably, all but three of those fourteen states post significantly higher reading scores than California. Studies also show that low-income and minority students who take a foreign language score significantly better on academic tests than students who do not. Arts and foreign language are key subjects in the kind of comprehensive, content-rich education that works for all students. California should not jettison these subjects.

The Governor is due to render his verdict on AB2446 tomorrow. We hope he’ll take the time to review this research and choose not to narrow the curriculum in California.

Lynne Munson and Stephanie Porowski

California Round Up

Monday, September 27th, 2010

With the Governor’s deadline to veto Assembly Bill 2446 coming up on Thursday, we’d like to offer a run-down of its attention from around the web. While the California Alliance for Arts Education continues to follow the bill, The Sacramento Bee and Education Week have posted provocative articles on it. Fordham calls the bill a “radical step backward in education reform.” Joanne Jacobs questions the quality of California’s CTE courses. The LA Times wonders if the California legislature watches “Glee.”  And Richard Kessler, executive director of the Center for Arts Education in New York, describes the plan as “completely backwards to a 21st century career and technical education.”

Stephanie Porowski

Curriculum Validation Now!

Monday, September 27th, 2010

As NBC’s Education Nation begins its march through the bevy of much-discussed (but little-proven) trends and ideas that comprise what is meant by “education reform” today, E.D. Hirsch, Jr. is right to bring attention back to curriculum in an op-ed for today’s New York Daily News.  Knowledge and vocabulary are what enables learning.  And the new Common Core State Standards, for all their promise, will not deliver in those key areas unless they are accompanied by excellent, content-driven curricula. Without such curricula the standards will most likely fail to improve learning, and could even drive achievement down in some states.  As Hirsch recommends, there is a real need for an independent board to validate the alignment of school materials the new standards.  As long as it embraces the kind of rigorous review criteria that is proven to show which curricula really works.  If not, it will become part of the problem.

Lynne Munson

California: Not College and Career Ready

Thursday, September 23rd, 2010

According to Achieve’s recently updated list of states with “college- and career-ready” graduation requirements, twenty-one states make the cut. California is not one of them.  Two-thirds of the states with college- and career-ready requirements have a foreign language and/or arts requirement for graduation.

With AB2446 poised to effectively eliminate California’s art/foreign language high school graduation requirement, does California really want to more further away from having college- and career-ready standards?

Update:  See Joanne Jacobs linking and thinking on this topic.

Lynne Munson and Stephanie Porowski

In California: Sewing Machine Basics or German?

Thursday, September 23rd, 2010

So what would California students lose if Governor Schwarzenegger signs AB2446, effectively eliminating the arts/foreign language high school graduation requirement? We looked to Granada High School in Livermore, California to find out. Currently, all students at Granada High School choose from a number of rich, content-filled courses to fill this requirement — courses like:

  • French, German and Spanish to “develop cultural understanding and fluency in the language being studied.”
  • Art: Drawing/ Painting to “develop the ability to aesthetically value and appreciate works of art, as well as understand the relationship between art, culture and history.”
  • Drama to “learn the foundations of performance: pantomime, improvisation, voice, diction, movement and technical theater.”

If the Governor signs AB2446, students could instead take courses designed to train them for the workforce — courses like:

  • Hospitality to “learn grooming and proper work ethic.”
  • Fashion Apparel to “learn sewing machine basics.”
  • Landscape Design to “grow flowers, ornamental plants and vegetables.”
  • Food for Singles to learn culinary “short cuts, new techniques, budgeting their food dollars, and multiple uses of appliances.”

For all the urgency generated by economic rationales for education reform, education is about more than workforce preparation. It’s about building creativity, wonder, cultural literacy and citizenship, for starters. Governor Schwarzenegger, don’t allow AB2446 to narrow the purpose of education.

Stephanie Porowski

Eyes on California

Tuesday, September 21st, 2010

California’s AB2446, the bill that would effectively eliminate California’s arts and foreign language high school graduation requirement, remains on the Governor’s desk. But we’re continuing our investigation into its potentially disastrous effect.

Currently, nearly 50% of California high school students take a foreign language. That’s nearly a million students–and a 10% increase in just the last seven years. These students are taking world-expanding courses in French, German, Latin, Spanish, and even Japanese. And for good reason.  Studies show that foreign language-taking improves students’ cognitive skills and performance across the subject areas. It even boosts their SAT scores. Not to mention that foreign language is an admissions requirement for any University of California or California State University school. In this age of concern for “college and career readiness” does it make sense for California to drop a key requirement  that prepares students for college?

Stephanie Porowski and Skye Frontier

P21: Wrong Again, According to ACT

Tuesday, September 21st, 2010

ACT has released an important study that proves, once again, that students need a broad and deep education in the core subjects to succeed in college.  ACT’s report, “Mind the Gaps,” found students more likely to earn a B or higher grade in their first-year courses in every subject tracked—from English to calculus, American history to biology—when students have taken a rigorous core curriculum in high school.  Students who have taken a challenging core also are less likely to drop out or need remediation.  The study is based on data on tens of thousands of postsecondary students who took the ACT.

Unfortunately fewer and fewer students are on track to follow ACT’s advice.  “Mind the Gaps” cites two 2008-09 surveys that found that 43% of 10th graders and 62% of 8th graders who expect to pursue at least a bachelor’s degree do not intend to take a college preparatory curriculum.  It seems the younger you are the less convinced you are that a challenging preparation in the core subjects is needed.

This is undoubtedly due, at least in part, to the effective anti-core, “21st century skills” campaigns waged by business-backed groups including the Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21).  P21, which is funded by a bevy of corporate tech foundations, has enjoyed some press as of late for their recent merge with the Council for Chief State School Officers and for their “policymaker’s guide” on the future of ESEA.   P21 has taken some flak from us and others for promoting an unproven and unworkable program that replaces core subjects with content-free skills education.  They continue to push for skills without content now under the guise of a “3 Rs and 4 Cs” approach that supposedly couples their favorite package of skills (critical thinking and problem solving, communication, collaboration, and creativity and innovation) with “reading, writing and arithmetic.”

But this is simply P21’s original, content-free program in new packaging.  P21 repeatedly claims, even in their “policymaker’s guide,” that they support “a focus on mastery of core subjects and higher-order thinking skills.”  But not a single one of their proposals emphasizes core subject learning.  Not a one.  And the only “proof” P21 provides to back up their skills-based recommendations is the results of a “2010 Critical Skills Survey” of 2,000 corporate managers and human resources professionals saying that they want employees with “‘top of mind’ skills for a fast-paced global economy.”

So, let’s follow the logic here.  Policymakers should insert 21st century skills into ESEA because corporate executives would like to see it there.  And, further, we should legislate an emphasis on 21st century skills across the board—from standards and assessment to professional development to research and development—again, solely because corporate America would like to see it so.  This all assumes, of course, that the purpose of education in America is not to educate citizens or to provide students with the knowledge they need to pursue their own dreams, but merely to supply the workers business wants.

I think it would be better if policymakers followed ACT’s sage and well-researched advice and looked at proposals that are going to give all students the deep and comprehensive education they need.

Lynne Munson

Food for Singles? Or, Food for Thought?

Monday, September 20th, 2010

We’re still looking to California for the Governor’s verdict on AB2446, the bill that would effectively eliminate California’s arts/foreign language graduation requirement. In the meantime, we’d like to turn his attention to the bill’s potential impact. With Granada High School in Livermore, California (just a short trip away from San Francisco’s diverse population and thriving arts culture) as our reference, we’ve learned that the bill would allow students to replace courses in art, orchestra, or French with studies in landscape design or personal nutrition. Instead of learning to analyze and create works of art, students at Granada High School would be able to meet graduation requirements by “transplanting seedlings.” And, rather than troubling with learning to understand another culture through its language, they would be able to learn how to prepare “quick and easy meals with fresh foods” in a “Food for Singles” course.

Valuable in the dorm room, yes. But substantive preparation for college coursework and future careers? Not so much. We hope Governor Schwarzenegger will join us in our skepticism. Until then, we’ll be blogging daily with more word on AB2446’s impending harm.

Stephanie Porowski

Not Appreciating the Best

Monday, September 20th, 2010

With DC schools struggling to improve, the last thing they should be doing is marginalizing one of their must substantive and effective educators.  Erich Martel taught AP US History courses at Wilson High School in Northwest Washington for 25 years, until he was involuntarily and inexplicably transferred to the Phelps Architecture, Construction and Engineering High School.   Martel is someone who teaches AP US History with absolute adherence to both the content and rigor of what is expected in an AP course.  Many teachers are less dedicated to teaching to the level an “AP” designation should indicate.

With Rhee’s future looking uncertain, we hope her successor will embrace the wisdom of better-supporting quality educators like Erich Martel.

Lynne Munson