Archive for May, 2010

P21: Where’s the Proof?

Thursday, May 20th, 2010

Most education reform efforts claim to improve student achievement or close achievement gaps between groups of students. So it’s puzzling that the Partnership for 21st Century Skills has enjoyed as much success as it has when there’s no data – none – that P21’s program improves learning one bit.

Don’t get us wrong: P21 does excel at producing data. But it is all about business’ opinions of what schools should be doing. Their most recent effort is a survey of 2,115 “managers and other executives” at member companies of the American Management Association, an organization that specializes in professional development for executives. The executives all placed high importance on P21’s “4 C’s” – critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity – not because they help provide students with a full education, but because the skills were deemed “crucial to workforce preparedness and business success.”

Forget English, history, art, and science class. Coming soon to classrooms near you: “How to Use a Photocopy Machine,” “Preparing for the Big Meeting,” and “How to Write a Business Plan.”  See for yourself.

James Elias and Lynne Munson

Dan’s Right

Monday, May 3rd, 2010

Dan Willingham’s Washington Post blog today on the relationship between income inequality and test scores is worth a read.  “Some countries have successfully minimized the disparity in educational outcomes between rich and poor,” Willingham points out.  “According to the PISA, the countries doing the best job include Iceland, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Canada, and Finland.”  What strikes us about this list is that five of these six nations have also repeatedly outranked the US on the PISA exam.  So these nations are not just closing equity gaps they are getting all of their students across the finish line better than the rest of the world. 

Willingham adds:  “I don’t know how other countries have addressed this problem. It may be curricular.”  We can confirm that his guess is on target.  We studied the content of education in these nations in Why We’re Behind and found that each was delivering a comprehensive, content-rich education to their students.  Some guarantee this education via a national curriculum or national tests, and some take a state-level approach, but each finds a way to make sure all of their students learn the arts, science, foreign languages, and much more (than just reading and math).

Lynne Munson