Archive for July, 2009

The Easy Way?

Wednesday, July 8th, 2009

It might be easier to lower standards than to expect all students to achieve at high levels. But is that really the right thing to do?

Lower standards are exactly what Louisiana is considering. On July 3, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal approved legislation to create a new high school career curriculum that will focus on teaching technical skills for blue-collar jobs instead of on preparing students for postsecondary education. The state legislature says the new plan is an effort is to lower drop out rates; but it seems more like an effort to find an easy solution, instead of doing what is best for students. Students that complete this track, which opponents say will lower education standards, will receive a “career diploma.” Chas Roemer, a member of the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, warns that the diploma will be meaningless and make it impossible for students to find good jobs.

Achieve, The Education Trust, and Jobs for The Future have all spoken out against the new curriculum stating “In attempting to design a work readiness path for students, you may inadvertently recreate the type of tracking system that leaves many students, particularly poor and minority students, unprepared for good careers and for further education after high school.” We agree.

We think all children have the ability to achieve at high levels; watering down what they are learning will only hurt students’ chances of success in school and in life.

The Partnership for 19th Century Skills

Monday, July 6th, 2009

I for one have heard quite enough about the 21st century skills that are sweeping the nation. Now, for the first time, children will be taught to think critically (never heard a word about that in the 20th century, did you?), to work in groups (I remember getting a grade on that very skill when I was in third grade a century ago), to solve problems (a brand new idea in education), and so on.Let me suggest that it is time to be done with this unnecessary conflict about 21st century skills. Let us agree that we need all those forenamed skills, plus lots others, in addition to a deep understanding of history, literature, the arts, geography, civics, the sciences, and foreign languages.

But allow me also to propose a new entity that will advance a different set of skills and understandings that are just as important as what are now called 21st century skills. I propose a Partnership for 19th Century Skills. This partnership will advocate for such skills, values, and understandings as:

The love of learning

The pursuit of knowledge

The ability to think for oneself (individualism)

The ability to work alone (initiative)

The ability to stand alone against the crowd (courage)

The ability to work persistently at a difficult task until it is finished (industriousness) (self-discipline)

The ability to think through the consequences of one’s actions on others (respect for others)

The ability to consider the consequences of one’s actions on one’s well-being (self-respect)

The recognition of higher ends than self-interest (honor)

The ability to comport oneself appropriately in all situations (dignity)

The recognition that civilized society requires certain kinds of behavior by individuals and groups (good manners) (civility)

The ability to believe in principles larger than one’s own self-interest (idealism)

The willingness to ask questions when puzzled (curiosity)

The readiness to dream about other worlds, other ways of doing things (imagination)

The ability to believe that one can improve one’s life and the lives of others (optimism)

The ability to speak well and write grammatically, using standard English (communication)

I invite readers to submit other 19th century skills that we should cultivate assiduously among the rising generation, on the belief that doing so will lead to happier lives and a better world.

Diane Ravitch