<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Timing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.commoncore.org/2009/07/23/bad-timing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.commoncore.org/2009/07/23/bad-timing/</link>
	<description>Promoting a full core curriculum.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 04:01:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darcy Pattison</title>
		<link>http://blog.commoncore.org/2009/07/23/bad-timing/#comment-6317</link>
		<dc:creator>Darcy Pattison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.commoncore.org/?p=98#comment-6317</guid>
		<description>While you may want &quot;clear guidance and examples of the kind of novels, non-fiction works, poems, and plays that students should read.&quot;, there is a right and a wrong way to do this.

Wrong: Include these in the standards with phrases &quot;such as,&quot; &quot;e.g.&quot;, or &quot;suggested readings including.&quot; These muddy the standards and render them confusing, at best. Are these &quot;suggested&quot; items merely suggested or required? In practice, educators tend to take them as givens. 

Right: Attach ancillary documents with suggestions.

Darcy Pattison</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While you may want &#8220;clear guidance and examples of the kind of novels, non-fiction works, poems, and plays that students should read.&#8221;, there is a right and a wrong way to do this.</p>
<p>Wrong: Include these in the standards with phrases &#8220;such as,&#8221; &#8220;e.g.&#8221;, or &#8220;suggested readings including.&#8221; These muddy the standards and render them confusing, at best. Are these &#8220;suggested&#8221; items merely suggested or required? In practice, educators tend to take them as givens. </p>
<p>Right: Attach ancillary documents with suggestions.</p>
<p>Darcy Pattison</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Common standards: Where&#8217;s the content? at Joanne Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://blog.commoncore.org/2009/07/23/bad-timing/#comment-6291</link>
		<dc:creator>Common standards: Where&#8217;s the content? at Joanne Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.commoncore.org/?p=98#comment-6291</guid>
		<description>[...] standards are a first draft that can be revised and improved, writes Common Core&#8217;s Lynne Munson. She hopes for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] standards are a first draft that can be revised and improved, writes Common Core&#8217;s Lynne Munson. She hopes for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

