Archive for June, 2009

P21′s Content-Free “Content”

Tuesday, June 30th, 2009

Today, the Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21) released two new “roadmaps” in geography and science. The maps provide a framework and resources for integrating technology and other 21st century skills into core subject areas. Last year, they put out maps for social studies and English/language arts. The new maps were created by P21 in consultation with the National Science Teachers Association and the National Council for Geographic Education.

What’s the problem? To begin, they include no content. We looked through each of the standards and activities for grades 4, 8, and 12 and could not find one specific reference to content knowledge students would learn by doing what P21 recommends. What we did find was a chart (pg. 16) highlighting the characteristics of 21st century learning, P21 style. It describes 21st Century standards and assessments as having less emphasis on “acquiring information” and on “assessing to learn what students do not know.” So, under P21’s plan, students will learn less and their knowledge gaps will go undetected.

Many of the activities P21 proposes are simply preposterous, especially when you consider that students would be doing these things without first “acquiring information”:

Science- 4th grade:

Students in the class role-play citizens in a town meeting where members of the community express different points of view about a local issue, such as the location of a new school, building a bypass for traffic, or a re-zoning of downtown to be “pedestrian only” without vehicles, etc.

Science- 8th grade:

Students view video samples from a variety of sources of people speaking about a science-related topic (e.g., news reporters, news interviews of science experts, video podcasts of college lectures, segments from public television documentaries, or student-made videos of parents and professionals in their community). Students rate the videos on the degree to which the person sounded scientific…

Geography- 12th grade:

To test the law of retail gravitation (i.e., the number of visits a resident makes to competing shopping centers is inversely proportional to the distances between residence and center and proportional to the size of the center), students work in small groups to conduct a community survey of a retail area’s “retail gravity” on a non-school attendance day….

Once again, P21 and their associates have it backwards. With strong content, quality teaching, and engaging lessons, students’ problem solving, critical thinking, creativity, and other related skills will develop as part of their learning.

Diane on Obama, NCLB, and Why We’re Behind

Monday, June 29th, 2009

Common Core co-chair Diane Ravitch had an interview over the weekend in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review where–along with putting more pressure on the Dept of Ed to confront the realities of NCLB–she discusses the findings in our new report, Why We’re Behind:

“We hear all the businessmen and politicians constantly saying we’re falling behind, we’re falling further behind, etc. Well, who are we behind? We’re behind countries that have a balanced curriculum. We’re behind countries that pay as much attention to history and the arts and science and geography and literature, and all we’re doing is basic skills and teaching to the test and that’s not going to help us catch up with those countries.”

Read the full interview here.

Lynne Munson

Virginia Third Graders Know Their History!

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009

Earlier this month, we posted about Virginia’s plan to drop its standardized social studies test taken by third graders. Our chief concern was that eliminating the test sends a message that social studies isn’t important enough to be tested. Consequently leading to less time spent on social studies in the classroom.

Well, we are happy to report a small victory: after much contention, the Virginia State Superintendent of Public Instruction withdrew the proposal to eliminate the test.

The scores on last year’s test, 93 percent passed, suggest that students are learning. The test measures what students know about “China, Greece and Mali, and the contributions of Americans such as Abraham Lincoln, Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr.” For some, the high scores are an argument for eliminating the test. If students are doing so well, then it is not needed.

But Common Core sees it another way. Perhaps students are doing well because teachers are actually teaching social studies; it is not being squeezed out of the curriculum as it is in other states.

We are glad Virginia reconsidered!

What About Civics?

Monday, June 22nd, 2009

Civics: a social science dealing with the rights and duties of citizens. It is one of the most important subjects in our schools, teaching students about the rule of law, the basics of government, and how to become productive participants of our democratic society. According to actor Richard Dreyfuss, civics needs a little pizzazz (He hates the word-and we agree) and that is exactly what he aims to bring to civics classrooms across the country. Dreyfuss is famous for films such as What About Bob?, The American President, and Mr. Holland ‘s Opus.  Recently, he spent time at Oxford University developing a civics curriculum for U.S. Schools. Dreyfuss, who is also a Civil War buff, would include scholarly presentations and storytelling as part of his curriculum “to engage, enlighten, and empower students of all ages in an entertaining way. “He intends to work with civics and education groups to promote his teaching tools. Why? Because Dreyfuss fears “that future generations will view our freedoms as a fairy tale.” Well put. Dreyfuss’ civics curriculum is not available yet; but, once it is, we will review it and let you know what we think!

The NAEP Arts Assessment: Not the NAEP You Know

Wednesday, June 17th, 2009

How would you describe NAEP?  Here’s what comes to mind for me:  a rigorous achievement test given regularly to a statistically significant number of students in a large number of schools in every state.  That description certainly fits NAEP’s reading and math assessments.  In 2007 NAEP’s reading and math tests each were given to approximately 350,000 4th and 8th graders at more than 14,000 schools.

Now let’s look at the NAEP arts assessment.  The 2008 test was given to just 7,900 students in 520 schools.  Now, for analysis purposes, cut that number in half because the test was actually two tests-one each in music and visual arts-and half the sample took each. So fewer than 4,000 students in 260 schools took each test.  That’s about 80 kids in five schools in each state.  Also, it was given just to 8th graders-no 4th or 12th graders need apply.  And, this is only the second time the arts assessment has been given in over 25 years. Reading has been given 13 times during that same period.

NAEP’s arts assessment is a different class of test than the NAEP tests we talk about most often.  Let’s not be confused about the quality of data the arts test represents.

In fact, it may be what’s absent from the NAEP arts assessment that is most instructive.  In 1997, both the first and last time the arts test was given, they tried to administer it in the four arts disciplines selected by the National Assessment Governing Board:  music, visual arts, dance, and theater.  But an initial field test determined that there weren’t enough dance programs in the schools to create a nationally representative sample of students who had received dance instruction.  So they dropped dance from the test.  A 2008 field assessment found that there were now not enough theater programs to produce a reliable sample of testable students.  So neither dance nor theater was tested in 2008.  Well, that’s revealing.  What subjects will they be able to test a decade from now?  Any?

Lynne Munson

My neighbor

Friday, June 12th, 2009

P21 National Summit-When he is not playing computer games or tracking his portfolio,  the guy sitting next to me here at the P21 meeting is promoting software that tests critical thinking skills.  He describes it to anyone who will listen as “content independent” and utilizing multimedia and “computer emulation” skills among others.  Not sure what he means by the latter.  He explains that the assessment is meant to discover whether a student has

-set a goal

-collaborated

-documented his learning

-and presented the results

Hmmm.  Those aren’t bad “goals.”  But it occurs to us that there are so many important things that have and should continue to go on in classrooms that fall outside this neat rubric.  How does “collaboration” help a student to learn the cadences of poetry?  How does a student “present results” pertaining to their understanding of the Renaissance or FDR’s New Deal?  And what do you “document” while you learn about Leonardo’s Last Supper?  Or while you learn how to speak French or Chinese?

There’s simply a round peg-square hole problem when one tries to overlay 21st century skills with actual knowledge.  Can this be remedied?  Only if the advocates for 21st century skills acknowledge that it exists and make a massive effort to correct it.

Lynne Munson

Updating the count…

Friday, June 12th, 2009

The second panel is wrapping up, 3 hours into the conference, and we are sad to report that there have been no additional mentions of specific content areas. Well, at least not ones that really count .. Ray Suarez wondered what’s the use of reading Plato or learning a foreign language….

Laura Bornfreund

Agreeing with Linda Darling-Hammond…

Friday, June 12th, 2009

P21 National Summit-A questioner of panel #2 raised the issue of American students’ impoverished writing skills.  He made the point that writing well is a key component of achieving in a wide range of skills.  He didn’t point out that P21′s agenda doesn’t stress writing in any way, but we’ve certainly noticed it.  Linda Darling-Hammond points out that students’ writing skills started going down after America embraced multiple choice tests in the 80s.  In our recent report “Why We’re Behind,” we recently found–and Darling-Hammond pointed to this, too–that many high-performing nations that have national tests utilize writing and long essay questions extensively.   Does any of the states’ tests under NCLB do the same?  We think not.

Lynne Munson

Roberto’s back…

Friday, June 12th, 2009

P21 National Summit-Obama education advisor Roberto Rodriguez has just described the administration’s priority as being concerned with “college and career readiness.”  He says that there are “different pathways” to that goal, including “innovative charter schools” (channeling Arne’s recent comments there) and that the ultimate goal is for students to obtain “a level of knowledge [and] skill” that prepares them for the world.  Might he realize that kids can only acquire skills or learn anything if they have a base of knowledge to build on?  He was also just channeling the Fordham Institute in mentioning that we need to “be honest with ourselves” about levels of rigor among the states so that what’s considered college and career ready is not “two grades” apart in different states.

Lynne Munson

Roberto?

Friday, June 12th, 2009

P21 National Summit-Okay, we’re 45 minutes into the second and final panel of the day and most of us are undoubtedly interested in hearing more from Obama administration representative Roberto Rodriguez.  But he’s said nothing since his initial comment.  Hmmm.  He’s not striking us as eager to be here.

Lynne Munson