Archive for December, 2008

Ravitch Examines U.S. performance on TIMSS

Thursday, December 11th, 2008

Diane Ravitch examines U.S. performance on TIMSS and remarks that “NCLB is having only a small positive impact on mathematics achievement, despite the massive investment in testing, test preparation and “remedies” for low performance.”One promising state is Minnesota; the state “adopted a coherent, focused, grade-by-grade math curriculum developed by a team of Michigan State University scholars and led by Professor William Schmidt. Minnesota competed in the TIMSS study and saw its scores jump from mediocre to world-class.”

Common Core thinks other states should examine what Minnesota is doing right and explore how to replicate their success.

In addition to serving as Co-Chair for Common Core’s Board of Directors, Diane Ravitch is a member of the Koret Task Force at the Hoover Institution, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a research professor at New York University.

Running in CIRCLEs

Tuesday, December 9th, 2008

We’re not quite sure what to think of a new study out today from CIRCLE, the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement.  CIRCLE is in part to blame for our confusion because their study is full of mixed messages.  It is titled “Narrowing at the Base:  The American Curriculum after NCLB.”  So it sounds like they found that NCLB has narrowed the curriculum.  But then the executive summary declares:  “NCLB is not mainly responsible for the narrowing trend in elementary school” and “we dissent from the theory that NCLB has directly caused a narrowing of the whole K-12 curriculum.”  Well…okay.

Incoherence aside, we do agree with CIRCLE that the narrowing trend predates NCLB.  It has its roots in the anti-core trends of the 60s, the back-to-basics reaction to the anti-core movement, and the push for STEM.  So, yes, it is a problem with a complicated history.

But there is good reason to think that NCLB has only made matters worse.  When Brown University education professor Martin West looked closely at data on what gets taught from the Dept of Ed’s Schools and Staffing Survey he found that, after NCLB was enacted, elementary school teachers spent 40 minutes more each week on reading and less time on other core subjects including history and science.  You can read West’s paper here: http://www.commoncore.org/liberalarts.php.

We plan to delve deeply into CIRCLE’s research that found a 10-year narrowing trend in the curriculum in grades one through five.  And we applaud their concluding summary statement:  “Narrowing is a trend that deserves public attention as NCLB reauthorization is debated.”  But we don’t understand why an organization so adamantly committed to the idea that NCLB has not narrowed the curriculum would urge us all to use the law’s reauthorization to debate the matter.  Alas, our confusion remains…

“What’s a Liberal Arts Education Good for?”

Monday, December 8th, 2008

Michael Roth (a historian and president of Wesleyan University) asks, “What’s a liberal arts education good for?” While his commentary is related to post-secondary education, it is relevant to k-12 education as well.  His short answer to the question is this:

Liberal arts in the USA provide not only a pipeline of talented and prepared students to the great graduate schools, but also a model for life-long learning that other countries are beginning to emulate.

Liberal learning introduces them (students) to books and the music, the science and the philosophy that form disciplined yet creative habits of mind that are not reducible to the material circumstances of one’s life (though they may depend on those circumstances).

Common Core agrees and takes it a step further: as students progress through elementary and secondary school, they need a strong liberal arts and sciences foundation that solidifies their capacity for analysis, creativity, critical thinking, and a love for learning.

Instead, school districts across the country are depriving students of the necessary educational scaffolding that helps them become, as Roth suggests, “innovators and productive risk takers, translating liberal arts ideals into effective, productive work in the world.”

Rote memorization and test preparation are taking the place of true liberal learning, which might inspire great test takers, but will hardly inspire the next generation of great thinkers.

It is no wonder, then, that early decision applications have increased this year at liberal arts colleges; Roth writes:

In these turbulent economic times, it appears that students want to know as quickly as possible if they are going to be able to attend their first choice school. Many of our talented high school seniors are doubtless deciding that the significant investment of time and money in a liberal arts education will give them the capacity for a sustainable and creative future.

I would also surmise that these applicants are craving a more rigorous, relevant, and substantive education than what they experienced in elementary and secondary school.

– Laura